Gaming is one of the most demanding tasks you can put on a computer, taxing both the graphics card and the CPU as you demand high frame rates, resolutions, and detail settings. Only by digging into technical activities like video editing or doing both simultaneously can you drive it further.
What is streaming?
Streaming refers to the process of listening to music or viewing video in real-time rather than uploading a file and watching it later.
There is no file to download for internet videos and webcasts of live events; instead, there is a continuous stream of data. Some broadcasters prefer streaming because most people find it challenging to save and distribute content illegally.
Since your internet link must be fast enough to view data in real-time, streaming is a relatively new development. To use as little bandwidth as possible, files encoded for streaming are often highly compressed.
The audio will drop out, or the screen will go blank if there is an interruption due to internet congestion.
To mitigate the issue, the PC keeps a ‘buffer’ of previously obtained data. The buffer goes down for a while if there is a drop-out, but the video is not interrupted. If the buffer is complete, it will generally come to a halt and display the message ‘buffering’ as it catches up.
Due to the proliferation of internet radio stations and numerous audio and video-on-demand services such as Spotify, Last.FM, YouTube, and the BBC’s iPlayer, streaming has become very common.
It needs to tick a range of boxes.
Unlike gaming alone, where a powerful graphics card can handle the full brunt of your demands, streaming and gaming at the same time necessitate the CPU pushing itself to its limits. As the GPU and CPU collaborate in rendering a game’s graphics, the CPU is responsible for encoding. If you’re going to stream and game simultaneously, you’ll need more processing capacity.
The one advantage of transcoding, mainly when done while gaming, is that it scales well with additional cores, and the workload can be distributed evenly among them. That’s not the case in games, where the single-threaded output will make a significant difference in how well a game runs. While a few cores are still needed to handle the most challenging modern games, once you get past six cores, the benefits start to dwindle.
That is what distinguishes the best CPU for streaming and gaming from the rest. It requires a high per-core output to handle the games and maintain high frame rates, but it also requires many cores for transcoding. This ensures that you don’t degrade your gaming output by putting demands on cores that aren’t needed to make the game and that you don’t degrade your viewers’ stream quality by transcoding at low resolutions or frame rates.
Best CPUS for streaming and gaming on a budget
It’s difficult to imagine a low-cost PC capable of both gaming and streaming at the same time, and it is. But it’s not out of the question. Chillblast has been producing high-performance gaming PCs for almost two decades, and our expertise allows us to get every last ounce of performance out of even the most basic PCs. You can check out this guide for Best Streaming Pc
1.AMD Ryzen 5 3600
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is the only processor worth considering for a PC that can play games and stream without breaking the bank.
This six-core CPU is a great gaming chip that can pump out high frame rates in Esports and even AAA games when paired with the right graphics card. This processor can be found in PCs like the Chillblast Fusion Recoil, which includes an Nvidia GTX 1650 Super graphics card, 16GB of RAM, and a terabyte of high-speed storage to ensure that nothing gets in the way of your gaming and streaming performance.
2.Intel Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is perhaps the best example of an Intel CPU that can compete with the Ryzen 5 3600 in gaming performance. It has six cores and 12 threads, much like the Ryzen 5 3600, but it operates at slightly higher clock speeds. It can be used in systems such as the Chillblast Fusion Insight Family PC, which sells for around £850 and is a beautiful little gaming machine.
Which is the better choice?
The Ryzen 5 3600’s support for simultaneous multithreading is the reason it’s so much better for gaming and streaming. That means that, despite the CPU’s six cores, it can simultaneously address 12 threads.
It’s not the same as having 12 real cores. Still, it significantly boosts multithreaded capacity, which is a massive help for video transcoding and makes this the perfect chip for entry-level gaming and streaming.
You’d have to pay a little more for the 10th-generation Core i5 10400F to get equivalent performance from an Intel processor. It, too, has six cores and 12 threads with hyperthreading, and it outperforms the Ryzen 5 3600, thanks to its faster clock speed.
It does, however, have some disadvantages. It needs a much more costly motherboard due to its socket type, making it a less budget-friendly choice. While it’s a good choice if you’re looking for an Intel gaming and streaming PC, its performance is similar enough to the Ryzen 5 3600 that the Ryzen is a better value in terms of price to performance.
If you want to overclock your AMD Ryzen PC, you can almost eliminate the output gap. Chillblast would gladly overclock every CPU in a new PC we put together. It would also not void the warranty. Please feel free to inquire about overclocking your new PC with one of our highly skilled device builders to see how much extra value you can get for free from your hardware.
Mid-range gaming and streaming CPU
A mid-range CPU can make a significant difference in your gaming and streaming experience, particularly if you have a powerful graphics card and want to make the most of it or if you want to ensure that your stream viewers can watch at higher resolutions or frame rates.
3.Intel Core i5-10600K
The Core i5-10600K is Intel’s latest mid-range king and arguably the best gaming CPU of its generation. Like the Core i5-10400F, it has six cores and 12 threads, but its cores are much faster. It is incredibly fast when running at full speed, with a boost clock of 4.8GHz and an all-core boost of 4.5GHz, and with a high base clock of 4.1GHz, even sustained load or high temperatures don’t slow it down much.
It can also be overclocked a lot. In some games, the 10600K has reached 5.0GHz, making it nearly as fast as the far more expensive Core i9-10900K.
4.Intel Core i7-10700K
The Core i7-10700K is an outstanding alternative Intel CPU if you can stretch your budget a little further.
It has eight cores, much like the previous generation 9700K, but this time with HyperThreading support, which means 16 threads, making it ideal for multitasking. The i7-10700K can achieve clock speeds of up to 5.1GHz thanks to Intel’s Turbo Boost technology, making it one of the most potent gaming processors ever created, comfortably outperforming its predecessor from the previous generation.
5.AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Although those CPUs are excellent for gaming and good streaming processors, AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X is the true king of mid-range gaming and streaming.
It’s a beast, with the same eight cores as the Ryzen 3700X but a boost clock of 300MHz on the base and boosts clocks for an overall boost of 4.7GHz. The Ryzen 7 5800X is a fantastic streaming CPU, focusing on accelerating productivity tasks where it can fully use its multithreaded capabilities.
It’s a decent CPU for gaming and streaming as well, but the 5800X shines when streaming and gaming simultaneously, where Intel processors have a distinct advantage. It’s also not prohibitively costly.
If you don’t need RTX 3090-level graphics when gaming, the Fusion Commando offers 5800X-equipped gaming and streaming PC for as little as £1,700.
6.Intel Core i9-10900K Vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
The two most powerful CPUs from AMD and Intel’s mainstream contemporary lines have even more cores. Both the Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD’s top-tier Ryzen 9 3900X have ten threads each, and both allow simultaneous multithreading for a total of double that number of threads.
They excel at different tasks, with the 10900K taking a clear lead in gaming performance, while the 3900X, thanks to its extra cores and threads, takes a slight lead in multithreaded applications like video transcoding.
Which one is better for you is highly dependent on your circumstances. If you want your gaming experience to look as good as possible, the 10900K is your best bet. The 3900X can allow you to provide a slightly better viewing experience for your audience, but it doesn’t offer anything else.
The best choice for you is highly dependent on your circumstances. The 10900K is your best bet if you’re more concerned with making your gaming experience look as good as possible. The 3900X can allow you to give your audience a slightly better viewing experience, but it’s not much.
The price is where you’ll see the difference. The Core i9-10900K is significantly more expensive, not just because the chip is more expensive but also because compatible motherboards are not inexpensive. You can, however, get by with a less expensive AMD 400 or 500-series motherboard and still get the most out of your 3900X.
The ultimate gaming and CPU for streaming
A few choices go beyond AMD and Intel’s best mainstream CPUs if all you care about is having the best processor for streaming experience for both you and your audience.
7.AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
AMD’s Ryzen 9 5950X is on the lower end of the spectrum. It can be installed on the same 500 series motherboards as previous generations of Ryzen CPUs, but it’s a workstation chip dressed up as a consumer chip.
It’s one of the best processors ever, no matter what you want to do with it, with 16 cores, support for 32 threads, and the ability to boost to 4.9GHz when required.
It’s not quite as powerful as Intel’s 9900K and 10900K as a pure gaming processor, but when it comes to transcoding video while you play, there’s almost nothing better.
Some of Chillblast’s most powerful PCs, including the Fusion Jumbo Signature Edition, contain it. This system includes a Ryzen 3950X processor, an Nvidia RTX 3080 graphics card, 32GB of high-speed DDR4 memory, and over 3.5TB of storage space – all for just under £3,300.
More cores than the 5950X provide will come in handy if you want to stream at ultra-high resolutions or edit video when you’re not live with the smoothest of live playback when dealing with your UHD video. AMD CPU for streaming that is specifically designed for this purpose.
They’re called Threadripper.
Previous Threadripper CPU generations were fantastic multitasking machines, but they lagged when it came to gaming. Threadripper 3000 CPUs, on the other hand, have no such issues.
The Threadripper 3960X has 24 cores, supports 48 threads, and still manages to reach a boost clock of 4.5GHz – and incredible hardware achievement as well as fantastic gaming and streaming CPU. When it comes to transcoding video, it far outperforms everything Intel has to offer – including its pricey HEDT CPUs – and provides all the power you’d need for a top-tier gaming and streaming machine.
The Threadripper 3970X and 3990X from AMD have even more cores and threads (32/64 and 64/128, respectively), but modern streaming services often underutilize such CPUs, so you may not be able to take advantage of them.
Send Chillblast’s expert device builders a call if you’re interested in the unparalleled video transcoding power they offer, and they’ll walk you through if they’re the suitable CPUs for you.
Alternative- Make a dedicated Streaming PC
If you already have a capable gaming PC and don’t want to spend a lot of money on a new one to stream while you play, you can buy a dedicated streaming PC to take the load off your main gaming computer.
It’s possible to play a game on one PC while the other does all of the video transcodings. It doesn’t have to be super-powerful, either, since it can concentrate solely on the streaming portion of your workload. You won’t even need to buy a graphics card if you have a CPU with a built-in GPU.
The only caveat is that if your gaming PC’s graphics card doesn’t support the requisite encoders to send the footage to your streaming PC over a network link, you will need to pay for a capture card. Be sure to account for this if you want to build a secondary PC for streaming.
The AMD Ryzen 3200G processor would be ideal for a streaming PC. Its four cores and ability to rise to 4.0GHz when required make it an excellent chip for the job. That can be found in attractive, lightweight PCs such as the Chillblast Fusion Imp, which costs only £570.
The Intel alternative to a dedicated streaming PC could be even less expensive. Its last-generation Core i3-9100 processor is a great little processor in and of itself, but with onboard graphics, it’s everything you need to get a streaming PC up and running. It has four cores and can be overclocked to 4.2GHz if necessary.
Aside from the CPU, storage is the only other factor to remember with these entry-level computers. It’s a brilliant idea to give them enough high-speed SSD storage to keep all of the footage you’re transcoding safe while it’s being worked on. To be secure, you’ll need a terabyte if you want to transcode something higher than 1080p.
Does CPU affect streaming?
The CPU in your streaming PC is crucial since it will be responsible for playing games and processing video and audio. A powerful processor will allow you to record or stream gameplay using high-quality software encoding while keeping the resolution and framerate constant.
The CPU encodes the stream before sending it to the streaming network while the GPU renders the game you’re playing so it doesn’t become unplayable while you’re streaming.
Which best CPU’S for streaming?
The phrase “best CPU for streaming” is a common search term these days. It’s not surprising, to be sure. Instead, when the rest of the planet is quarantined, many people are trapped at home, finding out what to do next. A lot of people rediscovered or rediscovered interests that they wanted to try. Streaming is one of these things.
Every modern internet user has fantasized about streaming at least once, whether as a hobby or as a potential career. Particularly gamers, since gaming streaming is one of the most popular types of streams available.
Of course, not just everyone can stream. Before you can show off your gaming prowess to the rest of the planet, you’ll need proper streaming equipment. All of this begins with the CPU or processor, which is the heart of the system. After all, all of your external gear would be useless if your PC can’t manage your streams.
So, with that in mind, we’d like to use this article to assist you in getting started with streaming by assisting you in selecting the right gear for the centre of your setup.
9.AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is an utter behemoth when it comes to sheer processing capacity and is likely the best CPU for streaming. Not surprising, given AMD’s dominance in the CPU market for many streamers. This is likely because most of the standard streams these days are for gaming, and AMD streaming pc produces some of the best gaming processors.
Let’s return to the Ryzen 9 3950X. There are 15 cores and 32 threads in this processor. This should be sufficient to run nearly all of your streaming programmes. Typical streaming applications such as Open Broadcasting Software (OBS) and XSplit Gamecaster are examples.
The AM4 socket is used by the Ryzen 9 3950X. As a result, they can be used with PCIe 4.0. This is a not-so-new stable socket that provides a slew of required improvements, from graphics to storage bandwidth, that your Ryzen 9 3950X can easily accommodate. GameCache is also used in this CPU. This is an extra 72 MB of on-chip memory that increases game performance. If you want to stream many triple-A games for your fans, a processor that significantly improves game output is a must.
However, no matter how intense the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is, it still has flaws. One of its significant drawbacks, given its youth, is the astronomically high price. This CPU is not suitable for beginners unless you are a novice with a veteran’s bank account. Even for a product with this price tag, we’re unsure why the 3950X’s initial kit doesn’t include a cooler. It’s a shame we had to get an external cooler for something we were looking forward to stress checking. We were excited about this, particularly given the high price, but were perplexed as to why AMD made this decision.
But don’t be put off by this. Again, this is a CPU with 16 cores and 32 threads. If you’re serious about getting this, you should already have enough money to get a fantastic cooling device. This processor’s sheer strength is no joke, and it certainly deserves to be included in a list of the “best.”
10.AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
You may be looking for a lot more bang for your buck as a budding streamer. You may have a budget, but it isn’t large enough for you to afford the 3590X. But don’t worry; its predecessor, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, may be just what you’re looking for.
The Ryzen 9 3900X, another of the most potent AM4 socket processors available, shaped all that the 3950X would be. Since the chipset has been around for a while, some older motherboards with the X470 or B450 chipsets may be compatible. However, we strongly advise you to purchase one of the newer X570 motherboards. The ASUS Prime X570-Pro, which we discussed in-depth in our white AM4 motherboards post, is an example of this. We strongly advise you to look at that one, particularly if you want to build a white rig.
The TSMC FinFET Process used in the 3900X is 7 nanometers. What do you mean by jargon? Perhaps. However, keep in mind that this processor’s 7 nm technology makes it quieter, more relaxed, and more powerful than most others. It uses AMD’s Zen 2 architecture, which is also used in the company’s recent products.
The Ryzen 9 3900X has one of the highest core and thread counts in the industry, despite not being as hardcore as the 3950X. It has 12 cores and 24 threads, making it suitable for multitasking and high-thread applications. Its base clock speed is.3 GHz faster than that of its 3950X descendant, which is nothing to sneeze at. The boost clock is a little slower than the 3950X, with a maximum boost rate of 4.6 GHz. The cache is 70 MB in size, which is around 2 MB smaller than its descendant.
Still, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X lacks nothing in terms of specifications for a processor that isn’t as costly as the 3950X. Make sure to take a look!
11.Intel Core i9-9900K 9th Generation Desktop Processor
AMD had complete control over the world’s most potent CPUs at the time. Intel, on the other hand, has not given up the war. The Intel Core i9-9900L 9th Generation Desktop Processor is likely one of the fastest – if not the fastest – CPUs on this list, demonstrating that the business is still competitive.
Intel’s Core series has always been a source of pride for the company, particularly when it comes to computing power. That’s why the i9-9900K has an overall base clock speed of 3.6 GHz. Sure, it’s average, but those who enjoy fast processing should rejoice at the maximum boosted 5 GHz of processing power. That’s a clock speed of 5 GHz, which means that whatever game or application you’re using will run smoother and more efficiently, whether you like it or not (obviously!).
The i9-9900K has more cores and threads than the average processor. It can be compared to lower-end high-end processors like the i7-9700K or Ryzen 7 2700X, which have 8 cores and 16 threads. But don’t be fooled since each core has the ability to process information faster. This results in a smooth gaming stream, which many skilled streamers appreciate.
There are no special coolers included with most Intel K or X series processors. This is because the heat output of these processors’ unlocked models is too much for stock coolers to accommodate. However, Intel gave the i9-9900Kan advantage that helps it prevent overheating. Solder Thermal Interface Content, or STIM, is used to build this processor. This type of material allows for more efficient heat transfer from the CPU to your choice’s cooler. And when you’re hauling heavy loads, this reduces the strain on your cooler. Overclockers can now rejoice because this CPU would not succumb so easily if their systems are appropriately designed.
12.Ryzen 7 3700X
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is still at the top of every website’s list regarding one of AMD’s best products from the previous decade. Why not when the Ryzen 7 3700X will likely match (if not outperform) the i9-9900K? We can confidently assume that it outperforms the current third-generation Ryzen 7 3800X in terms of value for a beginner streamer.
Let’s look at each of the relevant comparisons for the Ryzen 7 3700X, 3800X, and Intel Core i9-9900K to demonstrate this. The first is its clock speed, which we believe is the 3700X’s “weakness.” This CPU has a base clock speed of 3.6 GHz, with overclocking speeds exceeding 4.4 GHz. In contrast to the two products listed, the 3700X is dominated by numbers: the 3800X has a higher base speed of 3.9GHz, while the i9-9900K has a maximum speed of 5 GHz. These are significant, and the 3700X falls short.
When it comes to cores and threads, all three of these computers have eight cores and sixteen threads. However, there is a distinction in their thermal design control. The TDP, also known as the thermal design point, is a unit of measurement for the heat produced by a CPU and dissipated by a cooling system. There is a lot of discussion about whether a processor with a higher clock speed and TDP is better than one with a lower TDP. Regardless, in this situation, we’ll have to go with the 3700X. It outperforms the other two due to its competitive clock speed and low TDP of 65. Yeah, the 3800X has a faster clock speed, but its TDP is capped at 105 W, which means it gets hotter than usual. The i9-9900K operates at 5 GHz and has a lower TDP of 85 W, but it has the same number of cores and threads as the other two. Although the 9900K does not come with a thermal cooler, the AMD Wraith Prism Cooler is included with the 3800X and 3700X. This is a significant plus in terms of value because you don’t have to spend a lot of money on a hardcore cooling system for your CPU to get it to work well.
Simply put, if you’re looking for a streaming CPU that offers excellent value for money, the Ryzen 7 3700X is the one for you. This is also common among beginner to mid-tier streamers, so take a look.
13.Intel Core i7-9700K Desktop Processor
Last on this list is a “classic,” since this CPU manufacturer has been around for more than a decade. We’re talking about the i7, specifically the Intel Core i7-9700K, the newest version of the i7. This CPU appears to be still alive and well, and it’s a perfect processor for new streamers.
If we’re talking about a brand/trademark’s durability, the i7 has everything else on this list beat. The i7 has been around since 2008, and it has remained one of the most reliable CPU brands for several years. It has remained one of Intel’s top CPUs, and early streamers have used it or other Ryzen for streaming CPUs. The i7-9700K continues to demonstrate that it can compete with today’s young guns.
The i7-9700K is a high-speed CPU, with a base clock speed of 3.6 GHz and a maximum overclock speed of 4.9 GHz. This processor’s single-core performance can only be defined as incredible, as it outperforms even the Ryzen 7 3700X. The computing power is further improved when combined with Intel Turbo Boost 2.0. This is ideal for games that have a lot of physics or rely on a large amount of data.
The thread count on the i7-9700K is lower than any of the other items on this list. Some transcoders will not be able to use it because it only has 8 cores and 8 threads. If you’re using other media production tools, this processor can feel a little constrained.
However, if you need high resolution or framerates for your streaming, this could be the best choice for you. The i7-9700K is a decent value for an older Intel Core Processor because of its high resolution and fast single-core processing.
Is Ryzen or Intel better for streaming?
Since AMD Ryzen typically has better multi-core performance AND a lower price per core, the response is yes, AMD Ryzen is better than Intel when streaming. More cores and threads benefit streaming video in general. As a result, a higher core count equates to improved streaming efficiency.
What GHz is best for streaming?
Use 2.4 GHz if you want more range. Use the 5GHz band if you need more output or tempo. The newer 5GHz band can cut through network congestion and interference to enhance network capacity.
Hardware encoding is much quicker and more reliable than software encoding. If you want to stream a game at 30 frames per second with a 1080p resolution at a reasonable quality, you’ll need an Intel CPU with a clock speed of 3 GHz or higher. That’s half of your CPU if you’re using a dual-core CPU.
i5 vs i7 streaming
When buying a CPU, one of the most prevalent concerns is whether or not stepping up one stage in the stack can yield significant benefits. Buyers are often unsure if upgrading from an i5 to an i7 for the extra cores is worth it, particularly for Intel, where the focus is on single-core speed rather than high core/thread counts. This guide will help you determine if an i7 is better than an i5 for gaming.
To be sure, this is aimed solely at gamers. Additional cores can help productivity workloads significantly, so upgrading from an i5 to an i7 can have a considerable effect, depending on the work you do and the software you use. Similarly, though the designations i5 and i7 have been around for a long time, we’re referring to the most recent mainstream CPUs (i5-9600(KF) and i7-9700(KF)/i7-9900) (KF). The concepts may apply to earlier or later generations, but because core counts and clock speeds have changed over time, be sure to check the details before making a decision!
Core i5 vs i7 for Gaming: Why pick the i5?
As previously mentioned, when we say i5, we are referring to the 9600(KF) for the time being. The 9600(KF) falls into Intel’s high-middle range of standard CPUs, with six cores and six threads. Six cores have become the modern gaming standard, with Ryzen 5 processors adding hyperthreading to their six-core designs, albeit at a lower single-core price. And, in most cases, this is more than enough for gaming. Current games rarely benefit from or scale well with more than six cores/threads, and the 9600K’s stock boost speed of 4.6GHz, for example, is more than enough when combined with the hexa-core architecture.
After this stage, any more money spent on the CPU would yield very little in terms of gaming efficiency. Unless you’re playing games that need parallel processing, you’re better off buying the 9600KF for $210 and investing the difference in a higher-end graphics card. The 9600KF + 2070 Super will almost consistently outperform the 9700KF + 2060 Super (for example), though costing around the same or less, depending on the AIB board you choose.
In almost all games, the argument for the i5 comes down to the significantly better price-performance value. Taking the difference between the i5 and i7 processors and saving or reinvesting it elsewhere in the PC (such as the GPU) would almost always result in more FPS in the end.
Core i5 vs i7 for Gaming: Why pick the i7?
So, for an extra $140, we can get an eight-core/eight-thread configuration on the i7 if we use the 9700(KF) as our reference example. Because of its improved stock boost speed of 4.9GHz as well as the two additional cores, the 9700(KF) is without a doubt one of the best gaming CPUs on the market. This does result in some slight increases in FPS, especially in terms of 1% lows for titles that can take advantage of parallel computing, but it is not noticeable in most games. Streamers are also interested in the extra cores because they can aid in the smooth uploading of video for streaming.
Instead, most users choose an i7 for future-proofing (whether it’s the 9700(KF) for eight cores, the 8700(KF) for hyperthreading, or the 9900(KF) for both). The extra costs aren’t worth it right now, but many tech experts expect that games will get better at using more cores/threads in the future (especially as consoles switch to an 8c/16t configuration), so the investment now could pay off later. Now, this isn’t assured, and the substantial price rise should be held in mind, but the peace of mind might be worth it to many.
In conclusion, the case for the i7 is one of anticipating the future and capturing every possible frame (with a comparable GPU) now, particularly if you intend to stream and need some extra cores to handle the load.
So, while your specific situation would dictate if you go with an i5 or an i7, if you’re just looking to play games, we’d suggest going with the i5 and putting the difference in the GPU. The i7, on the other hand, is a strong CPU if you’re trying to future-proof your system or are playing games that need a lot of CPU power or are designed for multiple cores. Similarly, if you have a mixed productivity/gaming workload or intend to stream frequently, the i7 extra cores might be more valuable and worth the extra money.